<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe CS4 Logo Fail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/2008/10/adobe-cs4-logo-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/2008/10/adobe-cs4-logo-fail/</link>
	<description>Making Flash Go</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:38:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowley</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/2008/10/adobe-cs4-logo-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-28705</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/?p=711#comment-28705</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s truly horrible. It&#039;s a good example of using the shiny blending tools in photoshop just because they are there. You get the feeling that whoever did this turned on all the bevel crap and then said &#039;look, i made it more better&#039;.  And true enough even if you had it without the shine it&#039;s the uncouth arse scratcher. Rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s truly horrible. It&#8217;s a good example of using the shiny blending tools in photoshop just because they are there. You get the feeling that whoever did this turned on all the bevel crap and then said &#8216;look, i made it more better&#8217;.  And true enough even if you had it without the shine it&#8217;s the uncouth arse scratcher. Rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onairgraphics</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/2008/10/adobe-cs4-logo-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-27866</link>
		<dc:creator>onairgraphics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/?p=711#comment-27866</guid>
		<description>At first view the logo is looking rather amazing.
The &quot;CS&quot; letters have a very much dynamic intention but the &quot;4&quot; fails poorly.

At second sight I thought: Oh my god, they´re right it´s really
&quot;a stick figure on its knees, scratching its ass.&quot; 
This second view intention is killing the whole (in general really amazing) logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first view the logo is looking rather amazing.<br />
The &#8220;CS&#8221; letters have a very much dynamic intention but the &#8220;4&#8243; fails poorly.</p>
<p>At second sight I thought: Oh my god, they´re right it´s really<br />
&#8220;a stick figure on its knees, scratching its ass.&#8221;<br />
This second view intention is killing the whole (in general really amazing) logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teach 10</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/2008/10/adobe-cs4-logo-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-27835</link>
		<dc:creator>teach 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/?p=711#comment-27835</guid>
		<description>says allot about the designer / coder balance that the folks at Adobe are striking with their new Flash software.

Revenge of the nerds, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>says allot about the designer / coder balance that the folks at Adobe are striking with their new Flash software.</p>
<p>Revenge of the nerds, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glorifiedg</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/2008/10/adobe-cs4-logo-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-27572</link>
		<dc:creator>glorifiedg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/?p=711#comment-27572</guid>
		<description>I hate it. I think the stick figure remark is right on the money. Aside from that, it&#039;s not even pleasant to look at. It&#039;s imbalanced and inconsistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it. I think the stick figure remark is right on the money. Aside from that, it&#8217;s not even pleasant to look at. It&#8217;s imbalanced and inconsistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rieteke</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/2008/10/adobe-cs4-logo-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-27239</link>
		<dc:creator>Rieteke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelwit.com/blog/?p=711#comment-27239</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a great logo, nice and clean.
And why should it work for each version of CS?
Such things need change! I think Adobe did a great job with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a great logo, nice and clean.<br />
And why should it work for each version of CS?<br />
Such things need change! I think Adobe did a great job with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

